Can You Spot the AI?

Choose the text you think was written by a human.

Responding to prompt: Write me a ten line poem about corgi con. its a gathering at san francisco beach with upwards of 1000 corgis.
Option A:

Golden Fields Of Corgis

The sunlight etched in memory
the sand, the tents, the crowd
the unleashed corgis running free
their coats of white, black, gold
and brown
Eyes, bear witness
see them run
their bodies are like bakery buns
such short, small cuteness
frames with fluff
like half-sized dogs
when half's enough

Option B:

On Ocean Beach sand,
A thousand corgis gather—
Barking tides of joy.
Snouts up to the breeze,
They race, roll, and chase each tail,
In sweatered delight.
Fluffy monarchs bark,
As waves crash applause nearby,
Their stubby legs proud.
Corgi Con, a dream unleashed.

Responding to prompt: Why was Scott Galloway in White Lotus, Season 3?
Option A:

It is unclear why Scott Galloway was in White Lotus. Some articles indicate that cameos are common in the series, but Scott Galloway is not an actor and, according to the Scott Galloway Podcast, required some coaching for his few lines.

Option B:

Scott Galloway's appearance in White Lotus, Season 3, was a creative decision meant to underscore the show's theme of unexpected power dynamics. Though not a traditional actor, his strong personality brought a unique realism. The director wanted a familiar face with intellectual gravitas to contrast with the resort’s decadence. His role, while brief, added layers to the narrative. Galloway reportedly enjoyed the experience despite initial nervousness.

Responding to prompt: What do you think of the social media influencer and blogger Tim Denning?
Option A:

Tim Denning is a popular online writer who provides motivational content and financial advice. His writing is accessible, often focusing on personal growth and success. He has a strong following and has published many articles on Medium and LinkedIn. His influence continues to grow due to his consistent posting and engaging tone.

Option B:

Though Tim Denning has demonstrated an incredible ability to create popular content, he can be criticized for some of the advice he provides. He often provides misleading or unsubstantiated financial advice (alongside disclaimers, to be fair), and his writing style is not very detailed or nuanced. That being said, he is often criticized simply because he is so popular, and it may be argued that many of his critics are simply jealous of his success. In conclusion, he is talented at appealing to his followers and monetizing blogging platforms like Medium.

Responding to prompt: In the book Lord Of The Flies, what does the conch symbolize?
Option A:

The conch in Lord of the Flies symbolizes order and structured society. Its presence provides the boys a way to establish rules and hold meetings. As the conch loses its influence, it parallels the breakdown of civilization on the island. Eventually, when the conch is destroyed, it marks the complete descent into savagery. The shell’s journey mirrors the group's devolution into chaos.

Option B:

The symbolism in Lord Of The Flies, as is the case for virtually any piece of literature, is subject to debate. Many would argue that it symbolizes order, and that its destruction represents a total descent into chaos. This can be substantiated by the effect Ralph (who represents the ego, and not the id) has when using the conch. That being said, virtually no novel of value is restricted to just one interpretation.

Responding to prompt: Is the 2025 movie "warfare" pro-war, or anti-war?
Option A:

The movie "warfare" was not intended by the director to be anti-war, but it can certainly be interpreted that way. Some users on the Reddit r/movies thread contend that the house itself is a symbol for Iraq, a structure that *spoilers* is devastated by a battle. When the American forces leave, overwhelming Al-Qaeda forces return. Though the American forces appear to be capable of defeating them in conventional warfare, the entire war seems to be arguably ineffective in the long-run.

Option B:

The 2025 movie "warfare" delivers a gritty depiction of modern battle through cinematic realism. While not overtly anti-war, its haunting visuals and emotional storytelling emphasize the cost of conflict. Critics suggest it straddles both camps—presenting bravery and camaraderie alongside trauma and loss. Viewers leave with a complex, reflective impression rather than a clear ideological stance.

Responding to prompt: What is the book Fahrenheit 451 attempting to say? In other words, what is the meaning of the work as a whole?
Option A:

Fahrenheit 451 warns about the dangers of censorship and the loss of intellectual freedom. In the society depicted, books are banned, and independent thinking is discouraged. This suppression creates a population that is easily manipulated. The novel highlights the importance of knowledge and personal connection. Ultimately, it promotes resistance against societal control through education and awareness.

Option B:

The meaning of the novel Fahrenheit 451 is debatable, but the author's actual intent was to convey feelings he had regarding television. Though it is valid to argue that he was cautioning against the detrimental effects of book-burning and censorship, another interpretation is that the novel criticizes entertainment, mass media, and a dystopian society incapable of thorough and independent thought. This is directly demonstrated by the book's depiction of televisions, a hedonistic pursuit of media entertainment to distract from an impending war, and general disdain for intellectuals and intellectual discourse of any kind.

Responding to prompt: Write a haiku about a shih tzu
Option A:

this is a shih tzu
he likes jumping on the couch
but he's way too short

Option B:

Fluffy tail bouncing
through the morning city streets—
a tiny lion.

Responding to prompt: Is the skin condition topical steroid withdrawal real?
Option A:

Though a peer-reviewed scientific study has validated the existence of Topical Steroid Withdrawal, that same study has also demonstrated that the condition is (as far as scientists currently know) rare and the direct result of not using topical corticosteroids as prescribed. While it is important to not be dismissive of Topical Steroid Withdrawal concerns, especially considering that more research is needed, the condition is often exaggerated and self-diagnosed on social media in favor of far more dangerous and unsubstantiated treatment plans.

Option B:

Topical Steroid Withdrawal is increasingly acknowledged by online communities and some practitioners, who argue it represents a genuine reaction to stopping corticosteroids. Many patients report severe symptoms such as burning, redness, and flaking after discontinuing long-term use. While current scientific literature has not reached consensus on the condition, the growing body of anecdotal evidence suggests a need for deeper investigation. Until more studies are done, it remains a contested but serious topic in dermatology.